![]() |
Moonchild, Carla Knopp, 1991 |
The Missing Myths of Texas, and a Return to Indiana.
In speaking with Carla Knopp at her east-side home and studio a few weeks ago in preparation for this blog, she explained that much of her work created during her time in Texas was sold hastily in a makeshift clearance sale in a store parking lot, somewhere between Texas and Indiana. She and a traveling companion had to make snap decisions and alternative arrangements after their vehicle broke down along the way. There simply was not room to travel on with all they had packed.
We may better imagine Knopp's work from the Texas years in looking at an image that survived the trip, of a painting called Prophetic Axewoman, 1986. The Texas piece shares a basic color scheme with a painting she will debut in Indianapolis a few years down the road, 6 AM Drug Test, 1990.
Besides the similar colors, both paintings show a standing female protagonist at the center. Both also presents a curious dreamlike narrative that is difficult to decipher in the waking hours but might make perfect sense in the REM of midnight.
In the Axewoman picture, a ghostly woman stands, weapon heavy in one hand at her side, while she gives a thumbs up with the other.
![]() |
Prophetic Axewoman, Carla Knopp, 1986 |
She appears in a clearing in a woods, the epicenter of a riddle of clues. A mesmerizing spiral of a freshly sliced tree trunk, a large hole hollow hiding place in a tree, a group of four seductive nymphs caressing the skeletal trees behind.
The forest maidens are are each a different color; one is flesh, the other three are the primary colors of all art – red, yellow and blue.
And finally, at the deep edge behind, is some brighter place, beyond the treeline and the archaic grasp of the scene. The light halos a blue mist around the woman and alludes to an escape route at the wood's edge or the encroaching light of day to break the hold of the confusing fugue.
The later Drug Test piece was in Carla Knopp's first exhibition upon her return to Indianapolis, the two-person show, Fine Lines, at Denouement Fine Art on Mass Avenue in April 1990. It was a show that featured new paintings by Knopp and carved wood sculptures by Vaughn Becker.
'6 AM' could refer to the time of morning, or it could refer to a test for heroin in the system, known as a 6-AM (short for 6-acetomorphine) test.
Regardless of the precise meaning, the image itself is as harrowing as a bloody hypodermic in your bowl of Cheerios.
![]() |
6 AM Drug Test, Carla Knopp, 1990 |
A naked standing woman (or seated looking up) is exposed, vulnerable as a specimen, in front of a white sheet draped between two poles flying the American flag. She's holding something in her hands, but it's not exactly clear. She's caught helpless, in a posture of composed surrender, between the power poles that pull not one way or the other – not either, not or – she's caught in the double bind of one in the same.
All around, in purple and dark blue, is an orbit of frenzied birds on attack mode. The horror of the moment is palpable and the crazy birds, especially, remind of the crow calls in Van Gogh's final canvas, his last look at the fields that drove him mad.
One can only imagine Knopp's 'lost' work from the Texas years in looking at these two images separated by a few years.
What bewildering narratives were produced? What melding of real and surreal? What puzzling parables of Knopp's were sold at a roadside, tumbling somewhere between Austin and Indy, let go of cut-rate, like Elvis velvets or bargain day roses?
Art at '80s End.
Steve Mannheimer was perhaps the most entertaining and astute of the various chroniclers of mid-to-late-1980s Indianapolis art. His weekly column in The Indianapolis Star was both exhaustive and tireless in its coverage. One such article, important to this topic, appeared on February 26, 1989, and was headlined “A sharing of art but not a school.”
It was a review of Ed Sanders then current show at 431 gallery, called Paintings from '88, but also concerned an interesting bunch of Indianapolis downtown artists, as a group.
In the column, he remarks on several of the artists, as follows,
“A signal event for the group was Thomas Keesee's show at Patrick King Contemporary Art in 1985... (of) haunted, almost gnomic, neo-mythical images.
...Brian Fick paints a world shrinking into itself, the sun withdrawn below the horizon.
...Steve Paddack exhibited pictures of bridges collapsing under the weight of viscous paint and bare, dirty apartment walls holed by pools of black.
(Ed) Sanders paints a shrouded world, drenched in night and ashes.”
And of Carla Knopp, Mannheimer writes,
“Before she moved to Texas, Carla Knopp painted tiny, unknowable incidents, illuminated by headlights.”
Applying pattern recognition to Mannheimer's observations, there certainly seems at least a thread of an aesthetic rope tying the artists together.
By a year later, Knopp is included with several of these artists in a show at the new Hindman Gallery of Contemporary Art located well north of downtown, more toward the money, in the Geist Reservoir area.
It was an exhibit Steve Mannheimer considered a landmark, for various reasons, but primarily because it showcased a group of artists he had been following closely for awhile by then, many his former students, who had been informing and challenging each other for the past several years in a series of shows, mainly at 431 Gallery.
They had, by 1990, self-organized under an umbrella title, the Indianapolis Artists Forum, although the primary impetus and driving factor behind the organization, was former 431 Gallery ringleader and fellow artist, Bill Adkins.
Highlights from Mannheimer's column appearing in the May 20, 1990, Indianapolis Star, are as follows,
“A couple of months ago, I saw an exhibition of paintings by Brian Fick at the 431 Gallery. A couple of his paintings reminded me uncannily of paintings done by Bill Adkins several years ago...One work also reminded me of a 5-or-6-year-old work by Carla Knopp.
The show got me thinking of other artists, of Ed Sanders, Steve Paddack, Jesse Speight, Tom Keesee, Terry Copen and others. They should be seen together, I thought. Their artistic voice is really collective, a chorus.”
![]() |
Rocks and Flowers, Brian Fick |
Later in the review of specific pieces in the show, Mannheimer points out further connections he sees,
“A meteor hits the center of Paddack's Poet with enough force to break your nose, the same force gnarled up in the tormented, engorged, angel overflying an earth ripe for penetration in Sanders' Oil on Canvas.
In Rocks and Flowers, Fick paints boulders with Sanders' lush brush, but in Tree Stump Painting, with its overall stump glazed wet and clear as a pool of water, he edges toward the mixed metaphor which Knopp prefers in Earth Jug, an apparition of a handled vase, an empty receptacle rising like a mountain, like a skyscraper. (Holly) Jackson likewise mixes her metaphors, turning falling leaves into Union Jewels.
When Larry Kline paints a desk-chair as a forest and waterfall, he realigns nature as artifact, deliberately confusing the form and boundary of his image . The same strategy Fick employs in his overbuilt frames.
The analogies go on and on...”
Mannheimer sums up his thoughts on the group of artists and the exhibition, and of their shared training at Herron, including time as students in his own classes,
“These artists have gone far beyond any tutelage. They now take their cues from each other and from the world they inhabit, inspect and recreate with a vision that is completely and uniquely theirs and the city's. It's now up to the city to see it and embrace it.”
We see Mannheimer's comments about Knopp's art as being illuminative, unknowable and metaphorical. Apt words to describe Knopp's mythological mysteriousness, the koan at the crux of her works, which portray the great doubts encountered along the existential way, life's road of maybe this or maybe that.
Another art writer at the time, Sharon Calhoun in Arts Indiana magazine (September 1990), reviewed the same show. She argues for a broader Herron aesthetic among not only the Indianapolis Artists Forum artists but their Herron instructors as well. She notes influences of certain faculty in their students, as follows,
“If you look, and not that hard, hints of Herron faculty can be seen in this exhibit: Robert Berkshire's abstract expressionism in the work of Ed Sanders; Robert Eagerton's bent for the naturalist's expression in Brian Fick's canvases; Peg Fierke's repetitive elliptical shapes reflected by Carla Knopp; Steve Mannheimer's constant push over the edge in the thick black voids of Steve Paddack's paintings...”
Although Calhoun questioned the emergence of any apparent Indianapolis school in the exhibit, she did approve of the efforts overall, summing up her remarks,
“Group exhibits are rarely as solid as this one. Whether it is like environment, like education, or like minds that bind these artists, the results should be applauded and supported.”
Later that year in September 1990, Knopp was included in another group show at Hindman Gallery, along with Holly Jackson, Teresa Sciscoe Madden, Ellie Siskind, Stephen Stoller and Penny Viantis.
Geist or Not...
As it would turn out, Carla Knopp's planned solo exhibit for the Hindman Gallery set to open May 10, 1991, was not to be. Called Human Bytes in an advertisement appearing in Arts Indiana May 1991, her work was already prepared and ready to hang, but the gallery ceased operations at the moment when she was the artist on-deck.
![]() |
Flashjoy, Carla Knopp, 1991 |
Steve Mannheimer in The Star and Marion Garmel, in The News, both fans of the gallery, outlined the reasons for the sudden cessation of Hindman Gallery, as a combination of a second opinion, second thoughts, or cold feet. (The articles appeared in April and September 1991.) The bottom line was that the owner, Marge Hindman, returned her concentration to the frame shop operations that preceded her progressive gallery interlude.
In speaking with Knopp, she acknowledged her disappointment when the gallery closed when she was next up. She had been working as a waitress, applying whatever extroversion she could muster at the job, as required. If there was a silver lining, to an inwards leaning artists being thrust into the populated milieu of a restaurant setting, it was the daily cast a characters who were to influence her next body of work. The series of portraits that would have been shown at Hindman's.
![]() |
Vic, Carla Knopp, 1991 |
Knopp began painting faces of customers she recalled from waiting tables. As she worked on each painting, she noticed that the memory image was transformed into a likeness of a person in her close circle of friends.
In thinking about her description of the process, it seems a metamorphosis, though not like Kafka's. Perhaps a process of prophesy more apparent and down-to-earth than her own axewoman's. A budding awareness of the reality of change. A modest epiphany like a fortune cookie message saying 'lemonade from lemons' or 'roll with the punches.'
The downtown artists scene will transform again and again, throughout the 1990s and into the 2000s, with the successive births of In Vivo Gallery, 4 Star Gallery and Harrison Center.
Carla Knopp will be there for the entire transmutation, changing and creating, as we shall see in Part Three.
Mark Diekhoff, April 2026
The material used in this article is being used under the fair use provisions of copyright law. The content is being used for educational purposes only, and all rights to the original content are held by their respective copyright owners. We do not claim ownership of any copyrighted material used in this work.



















%20%20Meg%20Lagodzki.jpg)
%203.jpg)
%201.jpg)
%202.jpg)
%204.jpg)










